How far is quasar UV/optical variability from damped random walk at low frequency?
Hengxiao Guo (1, 2), Junxian Wang (1), Zhengyi Cai (1), Mouyuan Sun, (1) ((1) USTC (2) UIUC)

TL;DR
This study investigates whether quasar UV/optical variability aligns with the damped random walk model at low frequencies, finding the low frequency PSD slope is likely no steeper than -1.3, suggesting other factors influence variability.
Contribution
The paper provides observational constraints on the low frequency PSD slope of quasar variability, challenging the assumption of a pure DRW model at low frequencies.
Findings
Low frequency PSD slope is no steeper than -1.3.
Red noise leakage can cause large scatter in variability parameters.
Other factors like magnetic fields or metallicity may influence quasar variability.
Abstract
Studies have shown that UV/optical light curves of quasars can be described with the prevalent damped random walk (DRW, also known as Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process) model. A white noise power spectral density (PSD) is expected at low frequency in this model, however, direct observational constraint to the low frequency PSD slope is hard due to limited lengths of the light curves available. Meanwhile, quasars show too large scatter in their DRW parameters to be attributed to the uncertainties in the measurements and the dependence of variation to known physical factors. In this work we present simulations showing that, if the low frequency PSD deviates from DRW, the red noise leakage can naturally produce large scatter in variation parameters measured from simulated light curves. The steeper the low frequency PSD slope is, the larger scatter we expect. Based on the observations of SDSS…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
