Superconducting parity effect across the Anderson limit
Sergio Vlaic, St\'ephane Pons, Tianzhen Zhang, Alexandre Assouline,, Alexandre Zimmers, Christophe David, Guillemin Rodary, Jean-Christophe, Girard, Dimitri Roditchev, Herv\'e Aubin

TL;DR
This study uses scanning tunneling spectroscopy to investigate how superconductivity in lead nanocrystals is affected by size, confirming Anderson's 1959 conjecture that superconductivity disappears when electronic level spacing exceeds the gap energy.
Contribution
First experimental demonstration of the Anderson limit in superconducting nanocrystals through direct spectroscopic measurements.
Findings
Superconducting parity effect observed in large nanocrystals.
Suppression of Cooper pairing when level spacing exceeds gap energy.
Validation of Anderson's criterion for the size limit of superconductivity.
Abstract
How small superconductors can be? For isolated nanoparticles subject to quantum size effects, P.W. Anderson conjectured in 1959 that superconductivity could only exist when the electronic level spacing is smaller than the superconducting gap energy . Here, we report a scanning tunneling spectroscopy study of superconducting lead (Pb) nanocrystals grown on the (110) surface of InAs. We find that for nanocrystals of lateral size smaller than the Fermi wavelength of the 2D electron gas at the surface of InAs, the electronic transmission of the interface is weak; this leads to Coulomb blockade and enables the extraction of the electron addition energy of the nanocrystals. For large nanocrystals, the addition energy displays superconducting parity effect, a direct consequence of Cooper pairing. Studying this parity effect as function of nanocrystal volume, we find the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
