Optimal quantification of contact inhibition in cell populations
David J. Warne (1), Ruth E. Baker (2), Matthew J. Simpson (1) ((1), Queensland University of Technology, (2) University of Oxford)

TL;DR
This paper proposes a Bayesian framework to optimize experimental design for accurately quantifying contact inhibition parameters in cell populations, addressing limitations of standard methods.
Contribution
It introduces a reformulated cell proliferation assay and a Bayesian approach to better estimate contact inhibition parameters, specifically growth rate and carrying capacity.
Findings
Optimized experimental design improves parameter estimation accuracy.
Bayesian analysis quantifies uncertainty in contact inhibition parameters.
Reformulated assay captures both low-density growth and contact inhibition effects.
Abstract
Contact inhibition refers to a reduction in the rate of cell migration and/or cell proliferation in regions of high cell density. Under normal conditions contact inhibition is associated with the proper functioning tissues, whereas abnormal regulation of contact inhibition is associated with pathological conditions, such as tumor spreading. Unfortunately, standard mathematical modeling practices mask the importance of parameters that control contact inhibition through scaling arguments. Furthermore, standard experimental protocols are insufficient to quantify the effects of contact inhibition because they focus on data describing early time, low-density dynamics only. Here we use the logistic growth equation as a caricature model of contact inhibition to make recommendations as to how to best mitigate these issues. Taking a Bayesian approach we quantify the trade-off between different…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
