Petz recovery versus matrix reconstruction
Milan Holz\"apfel, Marcus Cramer, Nilanjana Datta, Martin B. Plenio

TL;DR
This paper compares Petz recovery maps and matrix reconstruction methods for quantum state recovery, showing that matrix reconstruction is more broadly applicable and extending these methods to long-range measurements for improved quantum tomography.
Contribution
It demonstrates that matrix reconstruction can recover a larger set of states than Petz recovery and introduces long-range measurement techniques for enhanced quantum state tomography.
Findings
Matrix reconstruction succeeds on all states recoverable by Petz recovery.
Long-range measurements enable reconstruction of states not accessible via local measurements.
Extended methods improve quantum tomography for many-body systems.
Abstract
The reconstruction of the state of a multipartite quantum mechanical system represents a fundamental task in quantum information science. At its most basic, it concerns a state of a bipartite quantum system whose subsystems are subjected to local operations. We compare two different methods for obtaining the original state from the state resulting from the action of these operations. The first method involves quantum operations called Petz recovery maps, acting locally on the two subsystems. The second method is called matrix (or state) reconstruction and involves local, linear maps which are not necessarily completely positive. Moreover, we compare the quantities on which the maps employed in the two methods depend. We show that any state which admits Petz recovery also admits state reconstruction. However, the latter is successful for a strictly larger set of states. We also compare…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
