Signatures of unresolved binaries in stellar spectra: implications for spectral fitting
Kareem El-Badry, Hans-Walter Rix, Yuan-Sen Ting, Daniel R. Weisz,, Maria Bergemann, Phillip Cargile, Charlie Conroy, and Anna-Christina Eilers

TL;DR
This paper investigates how unresolved binary stars affect spectral fitting, revealing biases in stellar parameters and proposing a binary model to improve accuracy and constrain binary populations.
Contribution
It introduces a binary spectral fitting model that corrects biases and enables analysis of unresolved binary systems using single-epoch spectra.
Findings
Fitting unresolved binaries with single-star models causes systematic biases in stellar parameters.
Biases are smaller at optical wavelengths compared to near-infrared.
Binary fitting model effectively corrects biases and constrains binary populations.
Abstract
The observable spectrum of an unresolved binary star system is a superposition of two single-star spectra. Even without a detectable velocity offset between the two stellar components, the combined spectrum of a binary system is in general different from that of either component, and fitting it with single-star models may yield inaccurate stellar parameters and abundances. We perform simple experiments with synthetic spectra to investigate the effect of unresolved main-sequence binaries on spectral fitting, modeling spectra similar to those collected by the APOGEE, GALAH, and LAMOST surveys. We find that fitting unresolved binaries with single-star models introduces systematic biases in the derived stellar parameters and abundances that are modest but certainly not negligible, with typical systematic errors of in , 0.1 dex in , and 0.1 dex in $[\rm…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
