On applicability of differential mixing rules for statistically homogeneous and isotropic dispersions
A. K. Semenov

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the applicability of differential mixing rules, especially the asymmetrical Bruggeman model, for homogeneous and isotropic dielectric dispersions, revealing physical inconsistencies and limitations in their use.
Contribution
The study demonstrates the inconsistency of the ABM and proposes generalized mixing rules, clarifying their valid concentration ranges using the compact group approach.
Findings
ABM is physically inconsistent for certain systems.
Generalized mixing rules depend on system structure and concentration.
Validity of mixing rules is limited by Hashin-Shtrikman bounds.
Abstract
The classical differential mixing rules are assumed to be independent effective-medium approaches, applicable to certain classes of systems. In the present work, the inconsistency of differential models for macroscopically homogeneous and isotropic systems is illustrated with a model for the effective permittivity of simple dielectric systems of impenetrable balls. The analysis is carried out in terms of the compact group approach reformulated in a way that allows one to analyze the role of different contributions to the permittivity distribution in the system. It is shown that the asymmetrical Bruggeman model (ABM) is physically inconsistent since the electromagnetic interaction between previously added constituents and those being added is replaced by the interaction of the latter with recursively formed effective medium. The overall changes in the effective permittivity due to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
