Neutrino Interferometry for High-Precision Tests of Lorentz Symmetry with IceCube
IceCube Collaboration: M. G. Aartsen, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, J. A., Aguilar, M. Ahlers, M. Ahrens, I. Al Samarai, D. Altmann, K. Andeen, T., Anderson, I. Ansseau, G. Anton, C. Arg\"uelles, J. Auffenberg, S. Axani, H., Bagherpour, X. Bai, J. P. Barron, S. W. Barwick, V. Baum

TL;DR
This paper uses high-energy atmospheric neutrinos observed at IceCube to perform the most precise test of Lorentz symmetry in the neutrino sector, finding no evidence of violation and setting stringent new limits.
Contribution
It introduces a novel high-precision test of Lorentz symmetry using IceCube neutrino data, constraining the Standard-Model Extension operators to unprecedented levels.
Findings
No evidence for Lorentz violation in neutrino oscillations
Set constraints on dimension-four Lorentz-violating operators at 10^{-28} level
Established the most stringent limits on Lorentz violation in neutrino physics
Abstract
Lorentz symmetry is a fundamental space-time symmetry underlying the Standard Model of particle physics and gravity. However, unified theories, such as string theory, allow for violation of this symmetry. Thus, the discovery of Lorentz symmetry violation could be the first hint of these theories. Here, we use high-energy atmospheric neutrinos observed at the IceCube Neutrino Observatory to search for anomalous neutrino oscillations as signals of Lorentz violation. The large range of neutrino energies and propagation baselines, together with high statistics, let us perform the most precise test of space-time symmetry in the neutrino sector to date. We find no evidence for Lorentz violation. This allows us to constrain the size of the dimension-four operator in the Standard-Model Extension for Lorentz violation to the level and to set limits on higher dimensional operators of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
