One-sample aggregate data meta-analysis of medians
Sean McGrath, XiaoFei Zhao, Zhi Zhen Qin, Russell Steele, Andrea, Benedetti

TL;DR
This paper introduces and compares two new median-based methods for meta-analyzing continuous outcomes reported as medians, demonstrating their superior performance over transformation methods, especially with skewed data.
Contribution
The paper proposes two novel median-based meta-analysis approaches and systematically compares them to existing transformation methods through simulations and real data application.
Findings
Median-based methods outperform transformation approaches with skewed data.
Median-based approaches are comparable or better than using actual means in meta-analysis.
Proposed methods are effective for skewed data and high inter-study variance.
Abstract
An aggregate data meta-analysis is a statistical method that pools the summary statistics of several selected studies to estimate the outcome of interest. When considering a continuous outcome, typically each study must report the same measure of the outcome variable and its spread (e.g., the sample mean and its standard error). However, some studies may instead report the median along with various measures of spread. Recently, the task of incorporating medians in meta-analysis has been achieved by estimating the sample mean and its standard error from each study that reports a median in order to meta-analyze the means. In this paper, we propose two alternative approaches to meta-analyze data that instead rely on medians. We systematically compare these approaches via simulation study to each other and to methods that transform the study-specific medians and spread into sample means and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
