Privacy in Feedback: The Differentially Private LQG
Matthew Hale, Austin Jones, Kevin Leahy

TL;DR
This paper introduces a differentially private approach to control in cyber-physical systems using LQR, ensuring privacy of state trajectories while maintaining optimal control through a cloud-based coordination, with theoretical bounds and simulations.
Contribution
It formulates a differentially private LQR framework, relating it to LQG, and provides bounds on privacy-utility trade-offs in cloud-coordinated CPSs.
Findings
Differential privacy can be integrated into LQR control for CPSs.
Bounds are established on how privacy affects control performance.
Numerical simulations validate the theoretical results.
Abstract
Information communicated within cyber-physical systems (CPSs) is often used in determining the physical states of such systems, and malicious adversaries may intercept these communications in order to infer future states of a CPS or its components. Accordingly, there arises a need to protect the state values of a system. Recently, the notion of differential privacy has been used to protect state trajectories in dynamical systems, and it is this notion of privacy that we use here to protect the state trajectories of CPSs. We incorporate a cloud computer to coordinate the agents comprising the CPSs of interest, and the cloud offers the ability to remotely coordinate many agents, rapidly perform computations, and broadcast the results, making it a natural fit for systems with many interacting agents or components. Striving for broad applicability, we solve infinite-horizon…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
