Type II supernova spectral diversity II: Spectroscopic and photometric correlations
Claudia P. Guti\'errez, Joseph P. Anderson, Mario Hamuy, Santiago, Gonz\'alez-Gaitan, Lluis Galbany, Luc Dessart, Maximilian D. Stritzinger,, Mark M. Phillips, Nidia Morrell, Gast\'on Folatelli

TL;DR
This study analyzes over 100 Type II supernovae to identify correlations between spectral and photometric properties, revealing how explosion velocities, light-curve features, and envelope masses are interconnected.
Contribution
It introduces the plateau duration `$Pd$' as a superior indicator of hydrogen envelope mass compared to traditional measures, supported by extensive correlation analysis.
Findings
Higher velocities correlate with brighter, faster-declining supernovae.
`Pd` correlates with late-time decline rate `s3`, indicating envelope mass influence.
Faster declining SNe~II have shorter `Pd` and lower envelope masses.
Abstract
We present an analysis of observed trends and correlations between a large range of spectral and photometric parameters of more than 100 type II supernovae (SNe~II), during the photospheric phase. We define a common epoch for all SNe of 50 days post-explosion where the majority of the sample is likely to be under similar physical conditions. Several correlation matrices are produced to search for interesting trends between more than 30 distinct light-curve and spectral properties that characterize the diversity of SNe~II. Overall, SNe with higher expansion velocities are brighter, have more rapidly declining light-curves, shorter plateau durations, and higher Ni masses. Using a larger sample than previous studies, we argue that `' - the plateau duration from the transition of the initial to `plateau' decline rates to the end of the `plateau' - is a better indicator of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
