TL;DR
This paper develops machine learning models to predict superconducting critical temperatures using chemical composition data, achieving high accuracy and identifying new potential superconductors from large materials databases.
Contribution
It introduces classification and regression models based on composition features, integrates new data features, and applies the models to discover new candidate superconducting materials.
Findings
Classification accuracy of 92% for $T_c$ prediction
Effective regression models for different superconductor families
Identification of over 30 new potential superconductors
Abstract
Superconductivity has been the focus of enormous research effort since its discovery more than a century ago. Yet, some features of this unique phenomenon remain poorly understood; prime among these is the connection between superconductivity and chemical/structural properties of materials. To bridge the gap, several machine learning schemes are developed herein to model the critical temperatures () of the 12,000+ known superconductors available via the SuperCon database. Materials are first divided into two classes based on their values, above and below 10 K, and a classification model predicting this label is trained. The model uses coarse-grained features based only on the chemical compositions. It shows strong predictive power, with out-of-sample accuracy of about 92%. Separate regression models are developed to predict the values of …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsInterpretability
