Dust masses of $z>5$ galaxies from SED fitting and ALMA upper limits

TL;DR

This study constrains dust masses in high-redshift galaxies using ALMA upper limits and SED modeling, revealing low dust production efficiency from supernovae and emphasizing the need for specific observations to distinguish star formation histories.

Contribution

It introduces a method combining ALMA upper limits with SED fitting to constrain dust masses and supernova dust production in $z>5$ galaxies, considering different star formation scenarios.

Findings

High dust temperature (>70 K) limits dust mass in Himiko to $ extless 2 imes 10^6$ M$_{ ext{odot}}$.

Supernovae are unlikely the dominant dust source at high redshift due to low dust yield per SN.

Observations at wavelengths below 1.2 mm can distinguish between different star formation models for Himiko.

Abstract

We aim at constraining the dust mass in high-redshift ($z\gtrsim 5$) galaxies using the upper limits obtained by ALMA in combination with the rest-frame UV--optical spectral energy distributions (SEDs). For SED fitting, because of degeneracy between dust extinction and stellar age, we focus on two extremes: continuous star formation (Model A) and instantaneous star formation (Model B). We apply these models to Himiko (as a representative UV-bright object) and a composite SED of $z>5$ Lyman break galaxies (LBGs). For Himiko, Model A requires a significant dust extinction, which leads to a high dust temperature $>70$ K for consistency with the ALMA upper limit. This high dust temperature puts a strong upper limit on the total dust mass $M_\mathrm{d}\lesssim 2\times 10^6$ M$_{\odot}$, and the dust mass produced per supernova (SN) $m_\mathrm{d,SN}\lesssim 0.1$ M$_{\odot}$. Such a low $m_\mathrm{d,SN}$ suggests significant loss of dust by reverse shock destruction or outflow, and implies that SNe are not the dominant source of dust at high $z$. Model B allows $M_\mathrm{d}\sim 2\times 10^7$ M$_{\odot}$ and $m_\mathrm{d,SN}\sim 0.3$ M$_{\odot}$.} We could distinguish between Models A and B if we observe Himiko at {wavelength $<$ 1.2 mm by ALMA. For the LBG sample, we obtain $M_\mathrm{d}\lesssim 2\times 10^6$ M$_{\odot}$ for a typical LBG at $z>5$, but this only puts an upper limit for $m_\mathrm{d,SN}$ as $\sim 2$ M$_{\odot}$. This clarifies the importance of observing UV-bright objects (like Himiko) to constrain the dust production by SNe.