Clustering of Local Group distances: publication bias or correlated measurements? V. Galactic rotation constants
Richard de Grijs, Giuseppe Bono

TL;DR
This study compiles and analyzes 162 measurements of the Galactic rotation speed to assess potential biases and derive updated Galactic constants, highlighting differences based on tracer populations and providing refined values for the Milky Way's rotation parameters.
Contribution
The paper presents the most comprehensive database of Galactic rotation speed measurements and offers updated, more accurate Galactic rotation constants considering tracer-dependent variations.
Findings
No evidence of publication bias in recent measurements.
Significant differences in rotation speed based on tracer populations.
Updated Galactic rotation constants with statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Abstract
As part of on an extensive data mining effort, we have compiled a database of 162 Galactic rotation speed measurements at (the solar Galactocentric distance), . Published between 1927 and 2017 June, this represents the most comprehensive set of values since the 1985 meta analysis that led to the last revision of the International Astronomical Union's recommended Galactic rotation constants. Although we do not find any compelling evidence of the presence of `publication bias' in recent decades, we find clear differences among the values and the ratios resulting from the use of different tracer populations. Specifically, young tracers (including OB and supergiant stars, masers, Cepheid variables, H{\sc ii} regions, and young open clusters), as well as kinematic measurements of Sgr A* near the Galactic Center, imply a significantly…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
