Radiation driven instability of rapidly rotating relativistic stars: criterion and evolution equations via multipolar expansion of gravitational waves
Andrey I. Chugunov (Ioffe Institute)

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new method for deriving evolution equations for rapidly rotating relativistic stars affected by CFS instability, using multipolar expansion of gravitational waves and focusing on global physical properties.
Contribution
It presents a novel approach that simplifies the derivation of CFS instability criteria and evolution equations, emphasizing physical properties over canonical quantities.
Findings
Provides a clear criterion for CFS instability based on gravitational wave emission.
Derives evolution equations showing gravitational waves directly influence star's spin.
Clarifies the relationship between different definitions of effective spin frequency.
Abstract
I suggest a novel approach for deriving evolution equations for rapidly rotating relativistic stars affected by radiation-driven Chandrasekhar-Friedman-Schutz (CFS) instability. This approach is based on the multipolar expansion of gravitational wave emission and appeals to the global physical properties of the star (energy, angular momentum, and thermal state), but not to canonical energy and angular momentum, which is traditional. It leads to simple derivation of the CFS instability criterion for normal modes and the evolution equations for a star, affected by this instability. The approach also gives a precise form to simple explanation of the CFS instability: it occurs when two conditions met: (a) gravitational wave emission removes angular momentum from the rotating star (thus releasing the rotation energy) and (b) gravitational waves carry less energy, than the released amount of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
