An Analysis of ISO 26262: Using Machine Learning Safely in Automotive Software
Rick Salay, Rodrigo Queiroz, Krzysztof Czarnecki

TL;DR
This paper examines how machine learning impacts automotive safety standards, specifically ISO 26262, and proposes adaptations to ensure safe implementation in driver assistance and autonomous systems.
Contribution
It analyzes the challenges ML introduces to ISO 26262 compliance and offers recommendations for standard adaptation to support safe ML integration.
Findings
ML complicates ISO 26262 safety certification
Recommendations for standard modifications to accommodate ML
Guidelines for safe ML deployment in automotive systems
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) plays an ever-increasing role in advanced automotive functionality for driver assistance and autonomous operation; however, its adequacy from the perspective of safety certification remains controversial. In this paper, we analyze the impacts that the use of ML as an implementation approach has on ISO 26262 safety lifecycle and ask what could be done to address them. We then provide a set of recommendations on how to adapt the standard to accommodate ML.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Software Testing and Debugging Techniques · Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
