A remark on the group-completion theorem
Simon Gritschacher

TL;DR
This paper provides an elementary proof that under certain conditions, the McDuff-Segal comparison map is acyclic, and explores implications for homotopy colimits of commutative monoids and their relation to Quillen plus-constructions.
Contribution
It offers a new elementary proof of the acyclicity of the McDuff-Segal comparison map under specific conditions and links homotopy colimits of commutative monoids to Quillen plus-constructions.
Findings
The comparison map is acyclic if left- and right-stabilisation commute on H_1(M).
If π_0M is central in the Pontryagin ring, the map always is acyclic.
Conditions are identified under which homotopy colimits relate to Quillen plus-constructions.
Abstract
Suppose that is a topological monoid satisfying to which the McDuff-Segal group-completion theorem applies. This implies that a certain map defined on an infinite mapping telescope is a homology equivalence with integer coefficients. In this short note we give an elementary proof of the result that if left- and right-stabilisation commute on , then the "McDuff-Segal comparison map" is acyclic. For example, this always holds if lies in the centre of the Pontryagin ring . As an application we describe conditions on a commutative -monoid under which can be identified with a Quillen plus-construction.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models · Advanced Topology and Set Theory
