The Voynich Manuscript is Written in Natural Language: The Pahlavi Hypothesis
J. Michael Herrmann

TL;DR
This paper presents evidence that the Voynich Manuscript is written in a natural language, specifically related to Pahlavi script, based on character analysis and linguistic clues, challenging its previous classification as a hoax or cipher.
Contribution
It establishes a link between the Voynich alphabet and Pahlavi script, providing a new perspective on its linguistic nature and potential meaning.
Findings
Many Voynich characters are upside-down Pahlavi characters.
Transcribed words include terms from Zoroastrian cosmology.
The relation to Pahlavi explains some ambiguities in the manuscript's script.
Abstract
The late medieval Voynich Manuscript (VM) has resisted decryption and was considered a meaningless hoax or an unsolvable cipher. Here, we provide evidence that the VM is written in natural language by establishing a relation of the Voynich alphabet and the Iranian Pahlavi script. Many of the Voynich characters are upside-down versions of their Pahlavi counterparts, which may be an effect of different writing directions. Other Voynich letters can be explained as ligatures or departures from Pahlavi with the intent to cope with known problems due to the stupendous ambiguity of Pahlavi text. While a translation of the VM text is not attempted here, we can confirm the Voynich-Pahlavi relation at the character level by the transcription of many words from the VM illustrations and from parts of the main text. Many of the transcribed words can be identified as terms from Zoroastrian cosmology…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEurasian Exchange Networks · African history and culture analysis · Islamic Studies and History
