Clear Thinking, vague thinking and paradoxes
Arieh Lev, Gil Kaplan

TL;DR
This paper emphasizes the importance of clear thinking in mastering mathematics, proposing that analyzing paradoxes can help students develop this skill, which is often overlooked in traditional education.
Contribution
It introduces the use of classical paradoxes as a tool for developing clear thinking skills in students, highlighting strategies from mathematical foundations.
Findings
Analyzing paradoxes improves students' clarity in mathematical reasoning.
Clear thinking is a skill that must be consciously developed, not naturally acquired.
The literature often underemphasizes the role of clear thinking as an analytical tool.
Abstract
Many undergraduate students of engineering and the exact sciences have difficulty with their mathematics courses due to insufficient proficiency in what we in this paper have termed clear thinking. We believe that this lack of proficiency is one of the primary causes underlying the common difficulties students face, leading to mistakes like the improper use of definitions and the improper phrasing of definitions, claimes and proofs. We further argue that clear thinking is not a skill that is acquired easily and naturally - it must be consciously learned and developed. The paper describes, using concrete examples, how the examination and analysis of classical paradoxes can be a fine tool for developing students' clear thinking. It also looks closely at the paradoxes themselves, and at the various solutions that have been proposed for them. We believe that the extensive literature on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScience Education and Pedagogy · Education and Critical Thinking Development · Mathematics and Applications
