Hubble Diagrams in the Jordan and Einstein Frames
Reza Rashidi

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether Hubble diagrams can distinguish between Jordan and Einstein frames in $f(R)$ gravity, concluding that only the rate of change over time, not the diagram itself, can serve as a differentiator.
Contribution
It demonstrates that Hubble diagrams alone cannot differentiate between the Jordan and Einstein frames, but their temporal evolution can.
Findings
Hubble diagrams are insufficient to distinguish the frames.
Long-term measurements of Hubble diagram changes can differentiate the frames.
Particle mass variation affects the interpretability of Hubble diagrams.
Abstract
Different models in cosmology generally predict different Hubble diagrams. Then, the comparison between the Hubble diagrams may be used as a way for distinguishing between different cosmological scenarios. But that is not always the case because there is no guarantee that two different models always have different Hubble diagrams. It may be possible for two physically-inequivalent models to have the same Hubble diagrams. In that case, the Hubble diagram cannot be used to differentiate between two models and it is necessary to find another way to distinguish between them. Therefore, the question of whether two different scenarios are distinguishable by using the Hubble diagrams is an important question which would not have an obvious answer. The Jordan and Einstein frames of theories of gravity are inequivalent, provided that the metricity condition holds in both frames. In the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
