Visual Similarity Perception of Directed Acyclic Graphs: A Study on Influencing Factors
Kathrin Ballweg, Margit Pohl, G\"unter Wallner, Tatiana von, Landesberger

TL;DR
This study investigates how humans perceive the similarity of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), identifying key visual factors like levels, node count, and shape that influence similarity judgments.
Contribution
It provides empirical insights into the visual factors affecting DAG similarity perception through a combined qualitative and quantitative analysis.
Findings
Similarity is mainly influenced by the number of levels.
Number of nodes on a level affects perceived similarity.
Overall shape of the graph influences perception.
Abstract
While visual comparison of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) is commonly encountered in various disciplines (e.g., finance, biology), knowledge about humans' perception of graph similarity is currently quite limited. By graph similarity perception we mean how humans perceive commonalities and differences in graphs and herewith come to a similarity judgment. As a step toward filling this gap the study reported in this paper strives to identify factors which influence the similarity perception of DAGs. In particular, we conducted a card-sorting study employing a qualitative and quantitative analysis approach to identify 1) groups of DAGs that are perceived as similar by the participants and 2) the reasons behind their choice of groups. Our results suggest that similarity is mainly influenced by the number of levels, the number of nodes on a level, and the overall shape of the graph.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
