Clinical Decision Support Systems: A Visual Survey

TL;DR

This paper provides a comprehensive visual scientometric survey of Clinical Decision Support Systems literature, analyzing key papers, authors, countries, and journals to aid researchers and practitioners in understanding the domain's landscape.

Contribution

It introduces a novel visual survey approach to analyze CDSS literature across multiple disciplines using network-based models, covering a broad spectrum of the domain.

Findings

Identified key turning point articles in CDSS literature

Highlighted highly cited authors and countries

Mapped influential journals and subject categories

Abstract

Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) form an important area of research. In spite of its importance, it is difficult for researchers to evaluate the domain primarily because of a considerable spread of relevant literature in interdisciplinary domains. Previous surveys of CDSS have examined the domain from the perspective of individual disciplines. However, to the best of our knowledge, no visual scientometric survey of CDSS has previously been conducted which provides a broader spectrum of the domain with a horizon covering multiple disciplines. While traditional systematic literature surveys focus on analyzing literature using arbitrary results, visual surveys allow for the analysis of domains by using complex network-based analytical models. In this paper, we present a detailed visual survey of CDSS literature using important papers selected from highly cited sources in the Thomson Reuters web of science. We analyze the entire set of relevant literature indexed in the Web of Science database. Our key results include the discovery of the articles which have served as key turning points in literature. Additionally, we have identified highly cited authors and the key country of origin of top publications. We also present the Universities with the strongest citation bursts. Finally, our network analysis has also identified the key journals and subject categories both in terms of centrality and frequency. It is our belief that this paper will thus serve as an important role for researchers as well as clinical practitioners interested in identifying key literature and resources in the domain of clinical decision support.