Isotopies vis-\`a-vis level-preserving embeddings
Hansj\"org Geiges

TL;DR
This paper presents a counterexample to the common claim in differential topology that the track of an isotopy of embeddings always results in a level-preserving embedding.
Contribution
It challenges a standard assertion by providing a simple counterexample, clarifying the limitations of level-preserving embeddings during isotopies.
Findings
Counterexample disproves the general claim
Level-preserving map need not be an embedding during isotopy
Clarifies misconceptions in differential topology literature
Abstract
Various standard texts on differential topology maintain that the level-preserving map defined by the track of an isotopy of embeddings is itself an embedding. This note describes a simple counterexample to this assertion.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
