The Hammersley-Welsh bound for self-avoiding walk revisited
Tom Hutchcroft

TL;DR
This paper revisits the classical Hammersley-Welsh bound for self-avoiding walks on two-dimensional lattices, providing a simplified proof and a slight, non-quantitative improvement based on recent sub-ballisticity results.
Contribution
It offers a new, simplified proof of the Hammersley-Welsh bound for 2D self-avoiding walks and improves the bound non-quantitatively using recent theoretical advances.
Findings
Simplified proof of the Hammersley-Welsh bound.
Non-quantitative improvement to the bound.
Connection to sub-ballisticity theorem of Duminil-Copin and Hammond.
Abstract
The Hammersley-Welsh bound (1962) states that the number of length self-avoiding walks on satisfies \[ c_n \leq \exp \left[ O(n^{1/2}) \right] \mu_c^n, \] where is the connective constant of . While stronger estimates have subsequently been proven for , for this has remained the best rigorous, unconditional bound available. In this note, we give a new, simplified proof of this bound, which does not rely on the combinatorial analysis of unfolding. We also prove a small, non-quantitative improvement to the bound, namely \[ c_n \leq \exp\left[ o(n^{1/2})\right] \mu_c^n. \] The improved bound is obtained as a corollary to the sub-ballisticity theorem of Duminil-Copin and Hammond (2013). We also show that any quantitative form of that theorem would yield a corresponding quantitative improvement to the Hammersley-Welsh…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
