Normal gravity field in relativistic geodesy
Sergei M. Kopeikin (University of Missouri, USA), Igor Yu. Vlasov, (Moscow State University, Russia), Wen-Biao Han (Shanghai Astronomical, Observatory, China)

TL;DR
This paper extends the concept of the normal gravity field from Newtonian to relativistic framework, deriving a post-Newtonian approximation for rotating spheroids and comparing it with the Kerr metric for applications in relativistic geodesy.
Contribution
It introduces a relativistic normal gravity field model for rotating spheroids, including a closed-form multipolar expansion and a relativistic generalization of the Somigliana formula.
Findings
The level surface of a rotating fluid is an axisymmetric spheroid of the fourth order in relativity.
The post-Newtonian normal gravity field is expressed via ellipsoidal harmonics in closed form.
The Kerr metric has limited applicability in relativistic geodesy.
Abstract
Modern geodesy is subject to a dramatic change from the Newtonian paradigm to Einstein's theory of general relativity. This is motivated by the ongoing advance in development of quantum sensors for applications in geodesy including quantum gravimeters and gradientometers, atomic clocks and fiber optics for making ultra-precise measurements of the geoid and multipolar structure of the Earth's gravitational field. At the same time, VLBI, SLR, and GNSS have achieved an unprecedented level of accuracy in measuring coordinates of the reference points of the ITRF and the world height system. The main geodetic reference standard is a normal gravity field represented in the Newtonian gravity by the field of a Maclaurin ellipsoid. The present paper extends the concept of the normal gravity field to the realm of general relativity. We focus our attention on the calculation of the first…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
