Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall for the major digital currencies
Stavros Stavroyiannis

TL;DR
This paper assesses the risk measures of major digital currencies using GARCH and Filtered Historical Simulation, revealing their higher risk levels and implications for risk management.
Contribution
It introduces an analysis of Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall for digital currencies using advanced econometric models, filling a gap in cryptocurrency risk assessment.
Findings
Digital currencies exhibit higher risk levels than traditional assets.
GARCH and Filtered Historical Simulation effectively capture cryptocurrency risk.
Higher risk necessitates larger buffers and risk capital for digital currencies.
Abstract
Digital currencies and cryptocurrencies have hesitantly started to penetrate the investors, and the next step will be the regulatory risk management framework. We examine the Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall properties for the major digital currencies, Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, and Ripple. The methodology used is GARCH modelling followed by Filtered Historical Simulation. We find that digital currencies are subject to a higher risk, therefore, to higher sufficient buffer and risk capital to cover potential losses.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
