Three statistically validated K2 transiting warm Jupiter exoplanets confirmed as low-mass stars
Avi Shporer, George Zhou, Andrew Vanderburg, Benjamin J. Fulton,, Howard Isaacson, Allyson Bieryla, Guillermo Torres, Timothy D. Morton, Joao, Bento, Perry Berlind, Michael L. Calkins, Gilbert A. Esquerdo, Andrew W., Howard, David W. Latham

TL;DR
This study reclassifies three K2 transiting objects initially thought to be warm Jupiter exoplanets as low-mass stars through radial velocity measurements, highlighting challenges in statistical validation methods.
Contribution
It provides the first mass and radius measurements for these low-mass stellar companions, demonstrating limitations of current validation techniques.
Findings
All three objects are low-mass stars, not planets.
Radial velocity data is crucial for accurate classification.
Challenges exist in distinguishing small stars from gas giants based on radius alone.
Abstract
We have identified three K2 transiting star-planet systems, K2-51 (EPIC 202900527), K2-67 (EPIC 206155547), and K2-76 (EPIC 206432863), as stellar binaries with low-mass stellar secondaries. The three systems were statistically validated as transiting planets, and through measuring their orbits by radial velocity monitoring we have derived the companion masses to be (EPIC 202900527 B), (EPIC 206155547 B), and (EPIC 206432863 B). Therefore they are not planets but small stars, part of the small sample of low-mass stars with measured radius and mass. The three systems are at an orbital period range of days, and the secondaries have a radius within , not inconsistent with the properties of warm Jupiter planets. These systems illustrate some of the existing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
