How the notion of ACCESS guides the organization of a European research infrastructure: the example of DARIAH
Suzanne Dumouchel (Huma-Num)

TL;DR
This paper explores how the concept of Access influences the development and organization of DARIAH, a European digital infrastructure for arts and humanities, emphasizing the importance of strategic choices in access policies.
Contribution
It develops a nuanced understanding of Access by analyzing five key aspects within DARIAH, highlighting the role of strategic decision-making in infrastructure organization.
Findings
Access involves deliberate selection and choices.
Interdisciplinarity and community involvement are central.
Managing tools and services is crucial for access.
Abstract
This contribution will show how Access play a strong role in the creation and structuring of DARIAH, a European Digital Research Infrastructure in Arts and Humanities.To achieve this goal, this contribution will develop the concept of Access from five examples: Interdisciplinarity point of view, Manage contradiction between national and international perspectives, Involve different communities (not only researchers stakeholders), Manage tools and services, Develop and use new collaboration tools. We would like to demonstrate that speaking about Access always implies a selection, a choice, even in the perspective of "Open Access".
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSemantic Web and Ontologies · Cultural Industries and Urban Development · Library Science and Information Systems
