Generative Models for Network Neuroscience: Prospects and Promise

TL;DR

This paper reviews the potential of generative models in network neuroscience, highlighting their ability to simulate neural network structures, infer underlying principles, and guide future empirical and theoretical research.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive overview of generative models in network neuroscience, emphasizing their applications, challenges, and future directions across various species and neural scales.

Findings

Generative models can replicate complex neural network properties.

Cross-validation is critical for model reliability.

Future work includes enhanced data collection and model development.

Abstract

Network neuroscience is the emerging discipline concerned with investigating the complex patterns of interconnections found in neural systems, and to identify principles with which to understand them. Within this discipline, one particularly powerful approach is network generative modeling, in which wiring rules are algorithmically implemented to produce synthetic network architectures with the same properties as observed in empirical network data. Successful models can highlight the principles by which a network is organized and potentially uncover the mechanisms by which it grows and develops. Here we review the prospects and promise of generative models for network neuroscience. We begin with a primer on network generative models, with a discussion of compressibility and predictability, utility in intuiting mechanisms, and a short history on their use in network science broadly. We then discuss generative models in practice and application, paying particular attention to the critical need for cross-validation. Next, we review generative models of biological neural networks, both at the cellular and large-scale level, and across a variety of species including \emph{C. elegans}, \emph{Drosophila}, mouse, rat, cat, macaque, and human. We offer a careful treatment of a few relevant distinctions, including differences between generative models and null models, sufficiency and redundancy, inferring and claiming mechanism, and functional and structural connectivity. We close with a discussion of future directions, outlining exciting frontiers both in empirical data collection efforts as well as in method and theory development that, together, further the utility of the generative network modeling approach for network neuroscience.