Critical Peaks Redefined - $\Phi \sqcup \Psi = \top$
Nao Hirokawa, Julian Nagele, Vincent van Oostrom, Michio, Oyamaguchi

TL;DR
This paper introduces two equivalent formal accounts of clusters in rewriting systems, providing a lattice structure that offers a new perspective on critical peaks and their refinements.
Contribution
It presents geometric and inductive definitions of clusters, proves their isomorphism, and applies this to redefine critical peaks in term rewriting.
Findings
Clusters form a lattice structure.
Geometric and inductive accounts are isomorphic.
New perspective on critical peaks in rewriting systems.
Abstract
Let a cluster be a term with a number of patterns occurring in it. We give two accounts of clusters, a geometric one as sets of (node and edge) positions, and an inductive one as pairs of terms with gaps (2nd order variables) and pattern-substitutions for the gaps. We show both notions of cluster and the corresponding refinement/coarsening orders on them, to be isomorphic. This equips clusters with a lattice structure which we lift to (parallel/multi) steps to yield an alternative account of the notion of critical peak.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
