SDSS-IV MaNGA: Uncovering the Angular Momentum Content of Central and Satellite Early-type Galaxies
Jenny E. Greene, Alexie Leauthaud, Eric Emsellem, J. Ge, A., Arag'on-Salamanca, J. P. Greco, Y.-T. Lin, S. Mao, K. Masters, M. Merrifield,, S. More, N. Okabe, D. P. Schneider, D. Thomas, D. A. Wake, K. Pan, D., Bizyaev, D. Oravetz, A. Simmons, R. Yan, F. van den Bosch

TL;DR
This study analyzes the angular momentum of central and satellite early-type galaxies using MaNGA data, revealing a strong dependence on stellar mass and minimal differences between galaxy types after accounting for mass and classification errors.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed comparison of angular momentum content between central and satellite early-type galaxies, accounting for classification uncertainties and halo mass effects.
Findings
High-mass galaxies (>10^11 M_sun) mostly have little rotation.
Lower-mass galaxies show significant net rotation.
No significant residual difference in angular momentum between centrals and satellites after matching for mass.
Abstract
We study 379 central and 159 satellite early-type galaxies with two-dimensional kinematics from the integral-field survey Mapping Nearby Galaxies at APO (MaNGA) to determine how their angular momentum content depends on stellar and halo mass. Using the Yang et. al. (2007) group catalog, we identify central and satellite galaxies in groups with halo masses in the range 10^12.5 h^-1 M_sun < M_200b < 10^15 h^-1 M_sun. As in previous work, we see a sharp dependence on stellar mass, in the sense that ~ 70% of galaxies with stellar mass M_* > 10^11 h^-2 M_sun tend to have very little rotation, while nearly all galaxies at lower mass show some net rotation. The ~ 30% of high-mass galaxies that have significant rotation do not stand out in other galaxy properties except for a higher incidence of ionized gas emission. Our data are consistent with recent simulation results suggesting that major…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
