Are high redshift Galaxies hot? - Temperature of z > 5 Galaxies and Implications on their Dust Properties
Andreas L. Faisst, Peter L. Capak, Lin Yan, Riccardo Pavesi, Dominik, A. Riechers, Ivana Barisic, Kevin C. Cooke, Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe, Daniel C., Masters

TL;DR
This study investigates the dust temperature and infrared properties of galaxies at redshift greater than 5, suggesting they are warmer than lower-redshift counterparts, which impacts dust modeling and IRX-$eta$ relation interpretations.
Contribution
It introduces a new perspective on the dust temperature and IR SED of high-redshift galaxies, proposing a modified model to explain their IRX-$eta$ relation behavior.
Findings
High-redshift galaxies have warmer IR SEDs than lower-redshift galaxies.
Assuming a maximally warm IR SED increases FIR luminosity estimates by 0.6 dex.
Radiation pressure causes spatial offsets affecting UV colors and IRX-$eta$ relation.
Abstract
Recent studies have found a significant evolution and scatter in the IRX- relation at z > 4, suggesting different dust properties of these galaxies. The total far-infrared (FIR) luminosity is key for this analysis but poorly constrained in normal (main-sequence) star-forming z > 5 galaxies where often only one single FIR point is available. To better inform estimates of the FIR luminosity, we construct a sample of local galaxies and three low-redshift analogs of z > 5 systems. The trends in this sample suggest that normal high-redshift galaxies have a warmer infrared (IR) SED compared to average z < 4 galaxies that are used as prior in these studies. The blue-shifted peak and mid-IR excess emission could be explained by a combination of a larger fraction of the metal-poor inter-stellar medium (ISM) being optically thin to ultra-violet (UV) light and a stronger UV radiation field…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
