The impact of charge compensated and uncompensated strontium defects on the stabilization of the ferroelectric phase in HfO$_2$
Robin Materlik, Christopher K\"unneth, Thomas Mikolajick, Alfred, Kersch

TL;DR
This study uses first-principles calculations to analyze how charge compensated and uncompensated Sr defects influence the stabilization of ferroelectric phases in HfO₂, revealing defect formation conditions and phase preferences.
Contribution
It provides a detailed first-principles analysis of Sr defect types and their effects on phase stability in HfO₂, explaining ferroelectric phase stabilization mechanisms.
Findings
Uncompensated Sr defects favor ferroelectric orthorhombic phase.
Charge compensated defects with oxygen vacancies favor non-ferroelectric tetragonal phase.
Oxygen partial pressure influences defect formation and phase stability.
Abstract
Different dopants with their specific dopant concentration can be utilized to produce ferroelectric HfO thin films. In this work it is explored for the example of Sr in a comprehensive first-principles study. Density functional calculations reveal structure, formation energy and total energy of the Sr related defects in HfO. We found the charge compensated defect including an associated oxygen vacancy SrV to strongly favour the non-ferroelectric, tetragonal P4/mnc phase energetically. In contrast, the uncompensated defect without oxygen vacancy Sr favours the ferroelectric, orthorhombic Pca2 phase. According to the formation energy the uncompensated defect can form easily under oxygen rich conditions in the production process. Low oxygen partial pressure existing over the lifetime promotes the loss of oxygen leading to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
