Bugs and features. A reply to Smaldino et al. (2017)
Alberto Acerbi, Edwin J. C. van Leeuwen
TL;DR
This paper offers a response to a previous critique regarding the interpretation of sigmoidal acquisition curves in social learning studies, clarifying methodological and conceptual misunderstandings.
Contribution
It clarifies the correct interpretation of sigmoidal curves in social learning research and addresses misconceptions raised by Smaldino et al. (2017).
Findings
Sigmoidal curves do not necessarily indicate conformity.
Methodological clarifications on analyzing acquisition curves.
Counterarguments to previous critiques.
Abstract
We provide here a reply to: Smaldino, P. E., Aplin, L. M. & Farine D. R., Do Sigmoidal Acquisition Curves Indicate Conformity? bioRxiv 159038 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1101/159038
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInsect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior · Primate Behavior and Ecology · Animal and Plant Science Education