Background Systematic Studies in VERITAS Data
Benjamin Zitzer, VERITAS Collaboration

TL;DR
This paper investigates why background significance distributions in VERITAS data often have greater width than expected, identifies causes, and proposes solutions to improve background estimation accuracy in gamma-ray astronomy.
Contribution
It analyzes the origins of wide significance distributions in VERITAS data and develops methods to correct background estimation issues.
Findings
Identified causes of wide significance distributions in VERITAS data
Developed solutions to improve background estimation accuracy
Tested solutions successfully on VERITAS data samples
Abstract
In the analysis of VERITAS and other IACT data, it is expected to get a distribution of statistical significances in sky map bins with mean of zero and width of unity in the absence of a -ray signal. However, it is not uncommon to see significance distributions of width greater than unity, indicating that the background is poorly estimated and the significances in the region of interest are incorrect. This work explores the origins of these wider significance distributions and develop solutions to this issue and test these solutions on samples of VERITAS data.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations · Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena · Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
