Coupled Electron-Ion Monte Carlo simulation of hydrogen molecular crystals
Giovanni Rillo, Miguel A. Morales, David M. Ceperley, Carlo, Pierleoni

TL;DR
This study compares Coupled Electron-Ion Monte Carlo and DFT-based Path Integral Molecular Dynamics simulations to investigate the structural and electronic properties of high-pressure solid molecular hydrogen, revealing differences in stability and conductivity.
Contribution
It provides a direct comparison of CEIMC and PIMD methods for hydrogen crystals, assessing the accuracy of DFT xc approximations for quantum protons under extreme conditions.
Findings
PIMD shows larger atomic fluctuations than CEIMC.
C2c structure is stable up to 250 GPa in PIMD but up to 450 GPa in CEIMC.
Hydrogen becomes metallic around 350 GPa, reaching Drude-like behavior at 500 GPa.
Abstract
We performed simulations for solid molecular hydrogen at high pressures (250GPaP500GPa) along two isotherms at T=200 K (phases III and VI) and at T=414 K (phase IV). At T=200K we considered likely candidates for phase III, the C2c and Cmca12 structures, while at T=414K in phase IV we studied the Pc48 structure. We employed both Coupled Electron-Ion Monte Carlo (CEIMC) and Path Integral Molecular Dynamics (PIMD) based on Density Functional Theory (DFT) using the vdW-DF approximation. The comparison between the two methods allows us to address the question of the accuracy of the xc approximation of DFT for thermal and quantum protons without recurring to perturbation theories. In general, we find that atomic and molecular fluctuations in PIMD are larger than in CEIMC which suggests that the potential energy surface from vdW-DF is less structured than the one from Quantum Monte…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
