
TL;DR
This paper analyzes the timing of burst pairs from FRB 121102, exploring their implications for underlying periodicity and emission models, and suggesting that such short intervals challenge Poissonian assumptions.
Contribution
It introduces a new interpretation of burst pairs from FRB 121102, examining their timing to constrain models of the source's emission mechanism and periodicity.
Findings
Burst pairs are inconsistent with Poissonian statistics.
Short intervals may help determine or exclude periodicity.
Timing analysis constrains emission models for FRB 121102.
Abstract
The repeating FRB 121102 emitted a pair of discrete bursts separated by 37 ms and another pair, 131 days later, separated by 34 ms, during observations that detected FRB at a mean rate of /s. Here I assume that these events are separate bursts rather than multiple peaks from longer single bursts and consider their implications. They then are inconsistent with Poissonian statistics. The measured intervals constrain any possible periodic modulation underlying the highly episodic emission. If more such short intervals are measured a period may be determined or periodicity may be excluded. Sources of narrow wandering beams predict pairs (or higher multiples) of bursts closely spaced in time compared to the mean event rate.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGamma-ray bursts and supernovae · Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research · Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
