Measurements of azimuthal anisotropy and charged-particle multiplicity in $d$$+$Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{NN}}}=$200, 62.4, 39, and 19.6 GeV
C. Aidala, Y. Akiba, M. Alfred, K. Aoki, N. Apadula, C. Ayuso, V., Babintsev, A. Bagoly, K.N. Barish, S. Bathe, A. Bazilevsky, R. Belmont, A., Berdnikov, Y. Berdnikov, D.S. Blau, M. Boer, J.S. Bok, M.L. Brooks, J., Bryslawskyj, V. Bumazhnov, C. Butler, S. Campbell

TL;DR
This study measures azimuthal anisotropy and charged-particle multiplicity in small $d$+Au collision systems across multiple energies, revealing flow signatures consistent with hydrodynamics at midrapidity and indications of nonflow effects at backward rapidity.
Contribution
It provides the first systematic measurement of $v_2$ and $dN_{ch}/d a$ across various energies in $d$+Au collisions, highlighting energy dependence and nonflow contributions.
Findings
Nonzero $v_2$ observed at all energies.
$v_2$ scales with $dN_{ch}/d a$ at 200 GeV.
Deviations from scaling at lower energies and backward rapidity.
Abstract
We present measurements of the elliptic flow, , as a function of transverse momentum (), pseudorapidity (), and centrality in Au collisions at 200, 62.4, 39, and 19.6 GeV. The beam-energy scan of Au collisions provides a testing ground for the onset of flow signatures in small collision systems. We measure a nonzero signal at all four collision energies, which, at midrapidity and low , is consistent with predictions from viscous hydrodynamic models. Comparisons with calculations from parton transport models (based on the {\sc ampt} Monte Carlo generator) show good agreement with the data at midrapidity to forward (-going) rapidities and low . At backward (Au-going) rapidities and GeV/, the data diverges from {\sc ampt} calculations of relative to the initial geometry, indicating the possible dominance…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
