The Viability of Phantom Dark Energy: A Brief Review
Kevin J. Ludwick

TL;DR
This review assesses the theoretical viability and observational compatibility of phantom dark energy, exploring field theory models and alternative frameworks that explain $w<-1$ without pathologies.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview of the theoretical challenges and potential solutions for phantom dark energy models in cosmology.
Findings
Most cosmological data are compatible with phantom dark energy.
Various models attempt to mitigate theoretical issues of phantom fields.
Alternative frameworks can explain $w<-1$ without phantom fields.
Abstract
In this brief review, we examine the theoretical consistency and viability of phantom dark energy. Almost all data sets from cosmological probes are compatible with dark energy of the phantom variety (i.e., equation-of-state parameter ) and may even favor evolving dark energy, and since we expect every physical entity to have some kind of field description, we set out to examine the case for phantom dark energy as a field theory. We discuss the many attempts at frameworks that may mitigate and eliminate theoretical pathologies associated with phantom dark energy. We also examine frameworks that provide an apparent measurement while avoiding the need for a phantom field theory.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
