Disentangling the role of the $Y(4260)$ in $e^+e^-\to D^*\bar{D}^*$ and $D_s^*\bar{D}_s^*$ via line shape studies
Si-Run Xue, Hao-Jie Jing, Feng-Kun Guo, and Qiang Zhao

TL;DR
This study investigates the coupling of the $Y(4260)$ to open charm channels through line shape analysis, supporting its interpretation as a molecular state mainly coupling to $Dar{D}_1(2420)$, and clarifies its interference with other charmonia.
Contribution
It provides a detailed line shape analysis showing the $Y(4260)$'s small partial widths to open charm channels and supports its molecular nature through interference effects and coupling patterns.
Findings
The $Y(4260)$ has much smaller partial widths to $D^*ar{D}^*$ and $D_s^*ar{D}_s^*$ than to $Dar{D}^* ext{pi}$.
Line shapes can be described by known charmonium states plus the $Y(4260)$, with interference causing a dip at 4.22 GeV.
Strong coupling of $Y(4260)$ to $Dar{D}_1(2420)$ supports the molecular state hypothesis.
Abstract
Whether the can couple to open charm channels has been a crucial issue for understanding its nature. The available experimental data suggest that the cross section line shapes of exclusive processes in annihilations have nontrivial structures around the mass region of the . As part of a series of studies of the as mainly a molecular state, we show that the partial widths of the to the two-body open charm channels of and are much smaller than that to . The line shapes measured by the Belle Collaboration for these two channels can be well described by the vector charmonium states , and together with the . It turns out that the interference of the with the other charmonia produces a dip around…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
