
TL;DR
This paper introduces a method for unbiased shrinkage estimation in linear regression that reduces variance without bias by leveraging additional information about covariate distributions, outperforming standard estimators.
Contribution
It demonstrates that in certain linear models, a James-Stein type shrinkage estimator can dominate the least-squares estimator for treatment effect estimation, even among unbiased estimators.
Findings
Shrinkage estimator reduces variance compared to least squares.
Dominates least-squares estimator in squared-error loss for treatment effect.
Applicable with at least three control variables and exogenous treatment.
Abstract
Shrinkage estimation usually reduces variance at the cost of bias. But when we care only about some parameters of a model, I show that we can reduce variance without incurring bias if we have additional information about the distribution of covariates. In a linear regression model with homoscedastic Normal noise, I consider shrinkage estimation of the nuisance parameters associated with control variables. For at least three control variables and exogenous treatment, I establish that the standard least-squares estimator is dominated with respect to squared-error loss in the treatment effect even among unbiased estimators and even when the target parameter is low-dimensional. I construct the dominating estimator by a variant of James-Stein shrinkage in a high-dimensional Normal-means problem. It can be interpreted as an invariant generalized Bayes estimator with an uninformative…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods and Inference · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference · Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
