A Cointuitionistic Adjoint Logic
Harley Eades III, Gianluigi Bellin

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new adjoint logic framework for bi-intuitionistic logic, separating intuitionistic and cointuitionistic components via dual linear categories, and develops models, calculus, and term assignments for it.
Contribution
It formalizes bi-intuitionistic logic using a three-world adjoint approach with dual linear categories, filling a gap in the categorical semantics literature.
Findings
Defined dual LNL models as dual to Benton’s LNL models.
Established correspondence between dual LNL models and dual linear categories.
Developed sequent calculus, natural deduction, and term assignment for the new models.
Abstract
One leading question with respect to Bi-intuitionistic logic (BINT) is, what does BINT look like across the three arcs -- logic, typed -calculi, and category theory -- of the Curry-Howard-Lambek correspondence? Categorically, BINT can be seen as a mixing of two worlds: the first being intuitionistic logic (IL), which is modeled by a cartesian closed category, and the second being the dual to intuitionistic logic called cointuitionistic logic (coIL), which is modeled by a cocartesian coclosed category. Crolard showed that combining these two categories into the same category results in it degenerating to a poset. However, this degeneration does not occur when both logics are linear. We propose that IL and coIL need to be separated, and then mixed in a controlled way using the modalities from linear logic. This separation can be ultimately achieved by an adjoint formalization of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, programming, and type systems · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Semantic Web and Ontologies
