An ALMA survey of submillimeter galaxies in the COSMOS field: Multiwavelength counterparts and redshift distribution
Drew Brisbin, Oskari Miettinen, Manuel Aravena, Vernesa Smol\v{c}i\'c,, Ivan Delvecchio, Chunyan Jiang, Benjamin Magnelli, Marcus Albrecht, Alejandra, Mu\~noz Arancibia, Herv\'e Aussel, Nikola Baran, Frank Bertoldi, Matthieu, B\'ethermin, Peter Capak, Caitlin M. Casey

TL;DR
This ALMA survey of submillimeter galaxies in the COSMOS field provides detailed redshift distributions and identifies multi-component systems, revealing how galaxy brightness correlates with redshift and supporting previous findings on submillimeter galaxy evolution.
Contribution
The survey offers the first large, high-resolution ALMA-based redshift distribution of submillimeter galaxies in COSMOS, with robust multiwavelength counterpart identification and analysis of brightness-redshift relations.
Findings
Redshift distribution peaks at z~2.0 with a median of 2.48
Brighter sources tend to be at higher redshifts
Faint sources have median z=2.18, bright sources z=3.08
Abstract
We carried out targeted ALMA observations of 129 fields in the COSMOS region at 1.25 mm, detecting 152 galaxies at S/N5 with an average continuum RMS of 150 Jy. These fields represent a S/N-limited sample of AzTEC / ASTE sources with 1.1 mm S/N4 over an area of 0.72 square degrees. Given ALMA's fine resolution and the exceptional spectroscopic and multiwavelength photometric data available in COSMOS, this survey allows us unprecedented power in identifying submillimeter galaxy counterparts and determining their redshifts through spectroscopic or photometric means. In addition to 30 sources with prior spectroscopic redshifts, we identified redshifts for 113 galaxies through photometric methods and an additional nine sources with lower limits, which allowed a statistically robust determination of the redshift distribution. We have resolved 33 AzTEC sources into…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
