Chemical abundances and ages of the bulge stars in APOGEE high-velocity peaks
Yingying Zhou, Juntai Shen, Chao Liu, Zhao-Yu Li, Shude Mao, Andrea, Kunder, R. Michael Rich, G. Zasowski, J. G. Fernandez-Trincado, Steven R., Majewski, Chien-Cheng Lin, Doug Geisler, Baitian Tang, S. Villanova, A., Roman-Lopes, M. Schultheis, David L. Nidever, Andr\'es Meza

TL;DR
This study revisits the high-velocity peaks in Galactic bulge stars using APOGEE DR13 data, finding that most fields show skewed velocity distributions without distinct peaks, and that stars in HV features are not systematically younger or chemically distinct.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the velocity distribution and chemical properties of bulge stars, challenging the idea that HV peaks are composed of younger stars and clarifying their relation to the Galactic bar.
Findings
Most bulge fields show skewed velocity distributions with a HV shoulder.
Only 3 out of 53 fields display distinct HV peaks around 200 km/s.
Stars in HV features are not systematically younger or chemically different.
Abstract
A cold high-velocity (HV, 200 km/s) peak was first reported in several Galactic bulge fields based on the APOGEE commissioning observations. Both the existence and the nature of the high-velocity peak are still under debate. Here we revisit this feature with the latest APOGEE DR13 data. We find that most of the low latitude bulge fields display a skewed Gaussian distribution with a HV shoulder. However, only 3 out of 53 fields show distinct high-velocity peaks around 200 km/s. The velocity distribution can be well described by Gauss-Hermite polynomials, except the three fields showing clear HV peaks. We find that the correlation between the skewness parameter () and the mean velocity (), instead of a distinctive HV peak, is a strong indicator of the bar. It was recently suggested that the HV peak is composed of preferentially young stars. We choose three fields…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
