Performance and structure of single-mode bosonic codes
Victor V. Albert, Kyungjoo Noh, Kasper Duivenvoorden, Dylan, J. Young, R. T. Brierley, Philip Reinhold, Christophe Vuillot and, Linshu Li, Chao Shen, S. M. Girvin, Barbara M. Terhal, Liang, Jiang

TL;DR
This paper compares various bosonic quantum error-correcting codes, including GKP, cat, and binomial codes, analyzing their performance under photon loss and introducing new codes and theoretical insights.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of bosonic codes using a common error model, introduces new binomial codes, and analytically evaluates their error correction conditions.
Findings
GKP codes outperform others at high loss rates.
Binomial codes outperform cat codes at low loss rates.
GKP codes' fidelity improves monotonically with photon number.
Abstract
The early Gottesman, Kitaev, and Preskill (GKP) proposal for encoding a qubit in an oscillator has recently been followed by cat- and binomial-code proposals. Numerically optimized codes have also been proposed, and we introduce new codes of this type here. These codes have yet to be compared using the same error model; we provide such a comparison by determining the entanglement fidelity of all codes with respect to the bosonic pure-loss channel (i.e., photon loss) after the optimal recovery operation. We then compare achievable communication rates of the combined encoding-error-recovery channel by calculating the channel's hashing bound for each code. Cat and binomial codes perform similarly, with binomial codes outperforming cat codes at small loss rates. Despite not being designed to protect against the pure-loss channel, GKP codes significantly outperform all other codes for most…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
