Comparing distributions by multiple testing across quantiles or CDF values
Matt Goldman, David M. Kaplan

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new method for comparing two distributions across quantiles or values, improving sensitivity especially in tails, while controlling the familywise error rate, and providing instant computation of p-values and confidence bands.
Contribution
It proposes an alternative to the Kolmogorov--Smirnov test that enhances tail sensitivity and computational efficiency, with extensions to various statistical settings.
Findings
Achieves strong control of familywise error rate across quantiles and values.
Provides an instant, formula-based computation of goodness-of-fit p-values and confidence bands.
Improves power in tail regions compared to traditional methods.
Abstract
When comparing two distributions, it is often helpful to learn at which quantiles or values there is a statistically significant difference. This provides more information than the binary "reject" or "do not reject" decision of a global goodness-of-fit test. Framing our question as multiple testing across the continuum of quantiles or values , we show that the Kolmogorov--Smirnov test (interpreted as a multiple testing procedure) achieves strong control of the familywise error rate. However, its well-known flaw of low sensitivity in the tails remains. We provide an alternative method that retains such strong control of familywise error rate while also having even sensitivity, i.e., equal pointwise type I error rates at each of order statistics across the distribution. Our one-sample method computes instantly, using our new formula that also…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
