Biases in metallicity measurements from global galaxy spectra: the effects of flux-weighting and diffuse ionized gas contamination
Ryan L. Sanders, Alice E. Shapley, Kai Zhang, Renbin Yan

TL;DR
This paper develops a model to correct biases in galaxy metallicity measurements caused by flux-weighting and diffuse ionized gas contamination, improving the accuracy of galaxy evolution studies.
Contribution
It introduces a new modeling framework that accounts for multiple emission sources within galaxies, addressing biases in metallicity estimates from global spectra.
Findings
Flux-weighting and DIG contamination can bias metallicity estimates by over 0.3 dex.
The models enable correction of biases in mass-metallicity and fundamental metallicity relations.
Future models should include DIG emission and multiple regions to avoid biased physical property estimates.
Abstract
Galaxy metallicity scaling relations provide a powerful tool for understanding galaxy evolution, but obtaining unbiased global galaxy gas-phase oxygen abundances requires proper treatment of the various line-emitting sources within spectroscopic apertures. We present a model framework that treats galaxies as ensembles of HII and diffuse ionized gas (DIG) regions of varying metallicities. These models are based upon empirical relations between line ratios and electron temperature for HII regions, and DIG strong-line ratio relations from SDSS-IV MaNGA IFU data. Flux-weighting effects and DIG contamination can significantly affect properties inferred from global galaxy spectra, biasing metallicity estimates by more than 0.3 dex in some cases. We use observationally-motivated inputs to construct a model matched to typical local star-forming galaxies, and quantify the biases in strong-line…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
