Modeling approaches for precise relativistic orbits: Analytical, Lie-series, and pN approximation
Dennis Philipp, Florian W\"oske, Liliane Biskupek, Eva Hackmann,, Enrico Mai, Meike List, Claus L\"ammerzahl, Benny Rievers

TL;DR
This paper compares different relativistic orbit modeling methods, including analytical, Lie-series, and post-Newtonian approximations, to improve the accuracy of satellite orbit predictions in relativistic regimes relevant for space missions.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of solution methods for relativistic orbit modeling, highlighting the accuracy and applicability of each approach in geodetic space missions.
Findings
Lie-series approach closely matches exact solutions for selected orbits.
Post-Newtonian approximation captures relativistic effects with acceptable accuracy.
Relativistic effects are significant compared to perturbations like solar radiation pressure.
Abstract
Accurate orbit modeling plays a key role in contemporary and future space missions such as GRACE and its successor GRACE-FO, GNSS, and altimetry missions. To fully exploit the technological capabilities and correctly interpret measurements, relativistic orbital effects need to be taken into account. Within the theory of General Relativity, equations of motion for freely falling test objects, such as satellites orbiting the Earth, are given by the geodesic equation. We analyze and compare different solution methods in a spherically symmetric background, i.e. for the Schwarzschild spacetime, as a test bed. We investigate satellite orbits and use direct numerical orbit integration as well as the semi-analytical Lie-series approach. The results are compared to the exact analytical reference solution in terms of elliptic functions. For a set of exemplary orbits, we determine the respective…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
