Comparing UV/EUV line parameters and magnetic field in a quiescent prominence with tornadoes
P. J. Levens, N. Labrosse, B. Schmieder, A. L\'opez Ariste, L., Fletcher

TL;DR
This study investigates the relationship between plasma and magnetic field parameters in a solar prominence with tornadoes, using multi-instrument high-resolution observations to analyze their correlations and properties.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed statistical analysis of plasma and magnetic field parameters at high spatial resolution in a prominence, offering new constraints for modeling such structures.
Findings
Magnetic field strongest (~30 G) in tornado-like legs, mostly horizontal.
Mg II k/h ratios around 1.4, consistent with previous prominence observations.
No significant correlation between magnetic and plasma parameters across different temperatures.
Abstract
Context. Understanding the close relationship between the plasma and the magnetic field is important to describe and explain the observed complex dynamics of solar prominences. Aims. We determine if a close relationship between plasma and magnetic field parameters measured in a well-observed solar prominence with high spatial resolution can be found. Methods. We select a prominence observed on 15 July 2014 from space (IRIS, Hinode, SDO) and from the ground (THEMIS). We perform a robust co-alignment of the data sets using a 2D cross-correlation technique. We derive the magnetic field parameters from spectropolarimetric measurements of the He I D3 line taken by THEMIS. Line ratios and line-of-sight velocities from the Mg II h and k lines observed by IRIS are compared with magnetic field strength, inclination and azimuth. Electron densities are calculated using Hinode/EIS Fe XII line…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
