Constraints on the Progenitor System of SN 2016gkg from a Comprehensive Statistical Analysis
Niharika Sravan (1), Pablo Marchant (1), Vassiliki Kalogera (1), and, Raffaella Margutti (1) ((1) Center for Interdisciplinary Exploration and, Research in Astrophysics (CIERA), Department of Physics, Astronomy,, Northwestern University)

TL;DR
This study uses Bayesian inference with stellar models to analyze the progenitor system of SN 2016gkg, finding a moderate probability of a binary origin and highlighting the importance of statistical methods in understanding supernova progenitors.
Contribution
The paper introduces a comprehensive Bayesian analysis combining stellar models and observational data to constrain the progenitor system of a Type IIb supernova, emphasizing the role of statistical inference.
Findings
Binary progenitors have smaller hydrogen envelopes than single stars.
Probability of binary progenitor is 22% with luminosity and temperature constraints.
Probability increases to 44% when including hydrogen-envelope mass and radius constraints.
Abstract
Type IIb supernovae (SNe) present a unique opportunity for understanding the progenitors of stripped-envelope (SE) SNe as the stellar progenitor of several Type IIb SNe have been identified in pre-explosion images. In this paper, we use Bayesian inference and a large grid of non-rotating solar-metallicity single and binary stellar models to derive the associated probability distributions of single and binary progenitors of the Type IIb SN 2016gkg using existing observational constraints. We find that potential binary star progenitors have smaller pre-SN hydrogen-envelope and helium-core masses than potential single-star progenitors typically by 0.1 Msun and 2 Msun, respectively. We find that, a binary companion, if present, is a main-sequence or red-giant star. Apart from this, we do not find strong constraints on the nature of the companion star. We demonstrate that the range of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
