A global scavenging and circulation ocean model of thorium-230 and protactinium-231 with realistic particle dynamics (NEMO-ProThorP 0.1)
Marco van Hulten, Jean-Claude Dutay, Matthieu Roy-Barman

TL;DR
This paper presents a 3D ocean model for Th-230 and Pa-231 isotopes, incorporating realistic particle dynamics to improve understanding of particle transport and past ocean circulation reconstructions.
Contribution
The study introduces a global circulation model of Th-230 and Pa-231 with detailed particle interactions, enhancing the accuracy of isotope distribution simulations.
Findings
Model reproduces Th-230 and Pa-231 concentrations well in many ocean regions.
Particulate isotope concentrations are improved but still low due to missing nepheloid layer particles.
The model supports a moderate affinity of Pa-231 to biogenic silica, aligning with observations.
Abstract
In this paper, we set forth a 3-D ocean model of the radioactive trace isotopes Th-230 and Pa-231. The interest arises from the fact that these isotopes are extensively used for investigating particle transport in the ocean and reconstructing past ocean circulation. The tracers are reversibly scavenged by biogenic and lithogenic particles. Our simulations of Th-230 and Pa-231 are based on the NEMO-PISCES ocean biogeochemistry general circulation model, which includes biogenic particles, namely small and big particulate organic carbon, calcium carbonate and biogenic silica. Small and big lithogenic particles from dust deposition are included in our model as well. Their distributions generally compare well with the small and big lithogenic particle concentrations from recent observations from the GEOTRACES programme, except for boundary nepheloid layers for which, as up to today, there…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
